Skip to contentSkip to stories

Updated

#Anthropic

Oct 8

Oct 8Thu
  1. QbitAIAI score52

    Claude Haiku 5.5 launches with higher benchmark scores and new migration requirements

    AIAnthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, which the article says outperforms DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM-5.3-Flash on official benchmarks and matches GPT-6 Luna on price. On OSWorld 2.1, its Low effort tier scores 42.0% at $0.07 per task, versus 15.7% at $1.45 for Haiku 4.5 at Max. Migrating from Haiku 4.5 requires changes to thinking configuration, sampling parameters, assistant prefill, and the computer-use tool version.

  2. Boris PowerAI score46

    OpenAI's GPT-6.1-Sol leads new Arena Alignment Index for agents

    AIThe Arena Alignment Index, built from over 90K real-world agent sessions across 27 models, ranks OpenAI's GPT-6.1-Sol first with a score of 87.9, ahead of Claude-Opus-5.5 at 83.2 and Grok-4.7 at 82.7. GPT-6.1-Sol also posted the lowest observed rates across the index's three signals: 0.89% Unauthorized Action, 1.98% False Attribution, and 2.34% Deceptive Completion. The index's authors report that newer models consistently outperform their predecessors across all four labs, suggesting broad progress in agent safety.

  3. LeiphoneAI score62

    Claude Haiku 5.5 gains on computer use but still trails Sonnet 5.5 in terminal coding

    AIAnthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, raising its OSWorld 2.1 score from 15.7% to 72.4% and supporting a 1 million token context window. The article notes Haiku 5.5 still scores 39.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against Sonnet 5.5's 70.6%, and that prompts above 100,000 tokens are priced higher, so migration costs need to be measured on real workloads.

  4. The DecoderAI score72

    Claude Haiku 5.5 cuts prices but uses more tokens than GPT-6 Luna

    AIAnthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, its fastest and most affordable small model, at prices up to 90 percent lower for most prompts under 100,000 tokens. Artificial Analysis ranks it first among small-class models on its Intelligence Index with a score of 43, but it consumes about three times the output tokens per task that GPT-6 Luna needs at maximum effort.

Oct 7

Oct 7Wed
  1. IThome · AIAI score72

    Anthropic releases Claude Haiku 5.5, cutting run costs about 75% from Haiku 4.5

    AIAnthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, which it calls the fastest, cheapest, and most capable Haiku model so far. On average it costs about 75% less to run than Haiku 4.5, with input at $0.10 and output at $0.50 per million tokens for requests up to 100,000 tokens. Anthropic also cut Sonnet 5.5's cache read price from $0.20 to $0.10 per million tokens, which it says lowers run costs by about 20% on many agent tasks.

  2. Simon WillisonAI score62

    Anthropic releases Claude Haiku 5.5, priced like GPT-6 Luna up to 100,000 tokens

    AIAnthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5, priced at $0.10 input and $0.50 output per million tokens up to 100,000 tokens, matching GPT-6 Luna. Beyond 100,000 tokens the price rises to $0.50 and $2.50, and the author found the new tokenizer uses about 1.25x as many tokens as Haiku 4.5 on the same long prompt. The model cannot disable reasoning and defaults to medium effort.

  3. MarkTechPostAI score67

    Anthropic releases Claude Haiku 5.5, a small model with 1M context

    AIAnthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5, its cheapest and fastest small model, priced at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens for prompts up to 100K tokens. It keeps a 1M token context window, up to 128K output tokens, and is generally available on the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud, Microsoft Foundry and Claude Platform on AWS. Anthropic reports 72.4% on OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) versus 15.7% for Haiku 4.5, and the article notes that non-default temperature, top_p or top_k values return a 400 error.

  4. AWS Machine Learning BlogAI score56

    Claude Haiku 5.5 becomes available on Amazon Bedrock and Claude Platform on AWS

    AIAnthropic's Claude Haiku 5.5 is now available on Amazon Bedrock and Claude Platform on AWS. According to Anthropic, it is the fastest and most efficient model in the Claude 5.5 family and costs around 75 percent less than Claude Haiku 4.5 for most tasks. The post also covers pairing it with Claude Opus 5.5 as a subagent layer and provides Boto3, Converse, and Anthropic SDK examples for calling the model.

  5. ThariqAI score67

    Claude Haiku 5.5 returns as a cheaper, faster small model

    AIAnthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5, which it describes as the cheapest, fastest, and most capable small model it has released. On average it costs around 75% less to run than Claude Haiku 4.5, and the author says it is 10x cheaper than Haiku 4.5 under 100k tokens. It can be tried with computer use, workflows, and the API.

    This story has a top pick“Anthropic releases Claude Haiku 5.5, scoring 43 on the Intelligence Index”

  6. Testing CatalogAI score62

    Anthropic releases Claude Haiku 5.5, its fastest and cheapest model

    AIAnthropic has released Claude Haiku 5.5, which the author describes as its fastest and cheapest model to date. The source says it costs about 75% less to run than Claude Haiku 4.5 and is the first Haiku model with an adjustable effort setting. The attached benchmark table reports Haiku 5.5 scores on tasks including computer use (OSWorld 2.1 offline subset, 72.4%) and Terminal-Bench 4.0 (39.2%), compared with Haiku 4.5 and other models.

  7. Claude BlogAI score70

    Anthropic releases Claude Haiku 5.5, its cheapest and fastest small model

    AIAnthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, which it calls its cheapest, fastest, and most capable small model. It costs around 75% less to run than Haiku 4.5 and is aimed at high-volume, cost-sensitive tasks such as summaries and classification. The release also cuts Sonnet 5.5 cache read prices by 50%, and the model is available on AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure.

  8. Artificial Analysis ArticlesAI score60

    Anthropic releases Claude Haiku 5.5, scoring 43 on the Intelligence Index

    AIAnthropic released Claude Haiku 5.5, which scores 43 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, up 26 points from the last Haiku release. Pricing is $0.10/$0.50 per 1M input/output tokens up to 100k tokens, rising to $0.50/$2.50 above that, but at max effort it uses about 162k output tokens per Intelligence Index task, roughly 3x GPT-6 Luna.

    Why it matters: The benchmark shows Haiku 5.5 scores well but uses far more output tokens than GPT-6 Luna, so cost per task matters beyond list price.

Oct 6

Oct 6Tue
  1. Claude Apps Release NotesAI score60

    Claude Haiku 5.5 launches as a fast, low-cost small model, and Max and Team plans gain monthly API credits

    AIAnthropic launched Claude Haiku 5.5, which it describes as the cheapest, fastest, and most capable small model it has released, aimed at high-volume, cost-sensitive tasks. Max and Team plans now include monthly API credits for running their own apps and agents on the Claude Platform, rolling out over a few days. Users claim the credits by linking a Claude Console organization in Settings > Billing for Max or Organization settings > Billing for Team.

    Why it matters: The notes name a new small model and a credit change for Max and Team plans, with the claim path, which matters for teams budgeting API use.

Oct 5

Oct 5Mon
  1. Liquid AIAI score37

    Liquid AI's d1 decision model adds vision, rivaling GPT-6.1 Sol at lower cost

    AILiquid AI released d1 with vision support, accepting images, text, or both as inputs. In tests on six real applications, d1 matched or beat GPT-6.1 Sol on four while costing 19x to 200x less than both GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5. It returns probabilities for yes/no, choice, or score questions in one forward pass, with text decisions in 200 to 300 ms.

Sep 28

Sep 28Mon
  1. Mike KriegerAI score67

    Anthropic releases Claude Sonnet 5.5, 30% faster and up to 30% cheaper than Sonnet 5

    AIAnthropic has released Claude Sonnet 5.5, the second model in the Claude 5.5 family. The company says it is more than 30% faster than Sonnet 5 and costs up to 30% less for most work.

    Why it matters: The post gives concrete speed and price changes against Sonnet 5, which helps readers judge whether the upgrade fits their workloads and budgets.

  2. Cat WuAI score72

    Claude Sonnet 5.5 Lifts Claude Code Task Completion by About 30%

    AIAnthropic's Cat Wu says Claude Sonnet 5.5 lets Claude Code users complete about 30% more tasks than with Sonnet 5. The model needs fewer tokens for the same work, and in a leaf-raking tool-call demo it finished 24 seconds faster using 6K fewer tokens.

    Why it matters: The post gives a measured Claude Code task-completion gain and a token-use example, showing what the model upgrade means for a coding agent workflow.