Skip to contentSkip to stories

Updated

#Expert opinion

Items with an AI score under 20 are hidden. Show low-relevance items

Nov 13, 2025

Nov 13, 2025Thu
  1. Cognition Blog (Devin, Windsurf)AI score65

    Cognition's Devin review says it excels at scoped junior-level engineering work

    AICognition's 2025 performance review says Devin works best on clear, verifiable tasks such as migrations, vulnerability fixes, and unit tests. The company reports a 67% PR merge rate, up from 34% last year, and cites a bank that cut migration time per file from 30-40 hours to 3-4 hours. It also says Devin struggles with ambiguous requirements, mid-task scope changes, and soft-skill work that still needs human engineers.

    Why it matters: The report pairs concrete migration, vulnerability, and test-coverage figures with named weaknesses, letting engineering leaders judge where an agent fits in their own workflow.

Nov 5, 2025

Nov 5, 2025Wed
  1. Aman SangerAI score37

    Spending more compute at indexing time improves retrieval without extra inference cost

    AIAman Sanger of Cursor argues that heavy compute spent at indexing time can be reused to improve performance without raising inference-time compute, with embeddings as the simplest mechanism. Cursor's background post says semantic search improves its agent's accuracy across frontier models, especially in large codebases where grep alone falls short.

Oct 30, 2025

Oct 30, 2025Thu
  1. Chip HuyenAI score27

    Chip Huyen's AI product lessons: UX, data, and team structure matter most

    AIChip Huyen argues that many AI product failures stem from user experience, data quality, and organizational structure rather than the AI itself. She cites a chatbot whose traction improved after adding pre-populated questions and a voice option for users whose hands were busy, and a lead scoring model that was broken because marketing wasn't asking the right questions. She also notes that senior engineers gain the most from AI coding while resisting it more, and recommends building small tools for daily frustrations to solve the "idea crisis."

Oct 27, 2025

Oct 27, 2025Mon
  1. Lilian WengAI score44

    On-policy distillation uses a teacher model as dense process reward

    AILilian Weng says on-policy distillation lets a teacher model act as a process reward model, providing dense rewards during training. The approach also prevents the out-of-distribution shock that SFT-style training can cause during rollouts. Thinking Machines' related post reports it outperforms other approaches for math reasoning and an internal chat assistant at a fraction of the cost.

Oct 22, 2025

Oct 22, 2025Wed

Sep 3, 2025

Sep 3, 2025Wed
  1. Cognition Blog (Devin, Windsurf)AI score38

    Eight Sleep Uses Devin AI as Data Analyst to Clear Ad-Hoc Requests

    AIEight Sleep integrated Cognition's Devin into its data workflows, letting staff tag Devin in Slack to query Snowflake, dbt, and Looker and check Amplitude. The company says it is now shipping 3x as many data features and investigations each week, with its ad-hoc data request queue near zero. Devin was used to trace a suspicious revenue spike to a better-than-expected email campaign.

Jun 11, 2025

Jun 11, 2025Wed
  1. Cognition Blog (Devin, Windsurf)AI score62

    Cognition argues multi-agent architectures are fragile and proposes context-sharing principles

    AICognition argues that parallel multi-agent architectures are fragile because subagents act on conflicting, unshared assumptions. It proposes two principles for reliable agents: share context and full agent traces, and treat actions as carrying implicit decisions. The post recommends simpler single-threaded designs for most cases and notes that context compression and fine-tuned models can extend long-running tasks.

    Why it matters: The post explains concrete failure modes of parallel multi-agent setups and offers two context-sharing principles, useful for anyone designing long-running agent systems.

Sep 11, 2024

Sep 11, 2024Wed
  1. Cognition Blog (Devin, Windsurf)AI score60

    Cognition tests OpenAI o1 models in Devin's coding agent benchmark

    AICognition tested OpenAI's o1-mini and o1-preview in a simplified Devin-Base agent, comparing them with GPT-4o on its internal cognition-golden benchmark. The chart reports Devin-Base scores of 25.9% with GPT-4o, 34.6% with o1-mini, and 51.8% with o1-preview, versus 74.2% for the production Devin. The post also describes the benchmark's realistic environments, simulated users, and agent-based evaluation.

    Why it matters: The post explains how Cognition evaluates coding agents with autonomous, environment-based tests, which shows how base-model swaps are measured in practice.