Skip to contentSkip to stories

Updated

All AI news

Showing low-relevance items too. Hide low-relevance items

Feb 5

Feb 5Thu
  1. Geoffrey HintonAI score26

    Hinton praises International AI Safety Report 2026 as essential reading on AI risks

    AIGeoffrey Hinton called the International AI Safety Report 2026 a thoughtful, detailed, and well-researched description of AI risks, essential reading for anyone writing or speaking about them. Yoshua Bengio's thread introduces the report as the most comprehensive evidence-based assessment of AI capabilities, emerging risks, and safety measures to date.

Feb 1

Feb 1Sun
  1. Yi TayAI score35

    Yi Tay on hiring for frontier AI teams, seniority, and publication norms

    AIYi Tay, who recently hired a full AI team from thousands of applications, says PhDs are still a reasonable training ground and that candidates often get noticed through strong work they publish. He argues that seniority matters little in today's LLM world, and that being at the cutting edge outweighs external social media visibility. He also disagrees with the view that being a middle author on many papers is a negative signal.

Jan 26

Jan 26Mon

Jan 25

Jan 25Sun

Jan 23

Jan 23Fri

Jan 19

Jan 19Mon
  1. Aman SangerAI score36

    Aman Sanger says speed will matter more than intelligence for synchronous coding

    AIAman Sanger of Cursor argues that synchronous coding is nearing diminishing returns to intelligence, with over 95% of queries expected to gain little from smarter models within months. He contends that extra intelligence matters mainly for asynchronous tasks that take developers hours, while UI work is bottlenecked by user intent rather than model capability. He is therefore excited about frontier models running at Composer-1 speed.

Jan 18

Jan 18Sun
  1. Hamel HusainAI score40

    Why I Stopped Using nbdev for AI-Assisted Coding

    AIHamel Husain says he stopped using nbdev, a literate programming environment he helped build and maintain, because AI coding tools struggle with its notebook-to-library workflow. He now uses Amp, Cursor, and Claude Code, and reserves notebooks for data analysis, machine learning, and exploratory work. He also favors conventional stacks such as Next.js for web development, arguing that AI performs best on widely used languages with abundant training data.

Jan 14

Jan 14Wed
  1. Chip HuyenAI score14

    Agentic Hackathon projects tackle long-running tasks, retrieval, and multimodal agents

    AIChip Huyen praised projects at last weekend's Agentic Hackathon, which hosted by MongoDB and Cerebral Valley, where she served as a judge. Teams tackled long-running tasks such as memory management, recovery from mid-task failures, and consistency across steps and sub-agents, along with adaptive retrieval across databases, search indices, and websites. Finalist demos are scheduled in San Francisco tomorrow, with talks by Douglas Eck.

Jan 13

Jan 13Tue

Dec 22, 2025

Dec 22, 2025Mon
  1. Xiaomi MiMoAI score23

    Xiaomi MiMo Scores Balanced Across Creative Writing and Artistic Perception Tests

    AIXiaomi's MiMo model was evaluated against two comparison models on creative writing and artistic perception tasks, with nine evaluators grading outputs on a 1-to-5 scale. In creative writing, MiMo was described as relatively stable and balanced, integrating logical structure with emotional depth, though it showed weaker prosodic adherence in classical Chinese poetry. In artistic perception, the report credited MiMo with balancing rational analysis and emotional expression.

Dec 19, 2025

Dec 19, 2025Fri
  1. Andrej KarpathyAI score75

    Karpathy's 2025 LLM review names RLVR and jagged intelligence as key shifts

    AIAndrej Karpathy's year-in-review lists the LLM paradigm changes he found most notable in 2025. He highlights Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR), which drove most capability gains as labs ran longer RL training, and describes LLM intelligence as jagged, strong in verifiable domains and weak elsewhere. He also covers Cursor-style LLM apps, Claude Code running on the user's computer, vibe coding, and the case for a visual LLM GUI.

Dec 18, 2025

Dec 18, 2025Thu

Dec 17, 2025

Dec 17, 2025Wed

Dec 10, 2025

Dec 10, 2025Wed
  1. Tim DettmersAI score60

    Tim Dettmers argues AGI will not happen due to physical computing limits

    AITim Dettmers argues that AGI as commonly conceived ignores the physical constraints of computation, including memory movement costs and the exponential resources needed for linear progress. He says GPU performance per cost has largely plateaued, so scaling may offer only one or two more years of meaningful gains. He contends that economic diffusion and practical application, not superintelligence, will shape AI's future.

Nov 29, 2025

Nov 29, 2025Sat
  1. Andrej KarpathyAI score62

    Karpathy argues LLMs are a new kind of intelligence shaped by commercial, not evolutionary, pressure

    AIKarpathy argues animal intelligence is only one point in a large space of possible minds, and LLMs arise from a fundamentally different optimization process. He contrasts survival-driven animal drives with LLM training shaped by imitation of human text, RL on task distributions, and user engagement metrics, which he says leaves LLMs jagged and prone to sycophancy. He calls LLMs humanity's first contact with non-animal intelligence and says people who build accurate internal models of them will reason about them better.

Nov 28, 2025

Nov 28, 2025Fri

Nov 25, 2025

Nov 25, 2025Tue
  1. Eugene YanAI score36

    AI shifts bottleneck from execution to human judgment and taste

    AIThe main post argues that AI has moved the bottleneck from execution to human judgment, vision, taste, and context. AI can explore options but cannot determine which is right, so specialization now lies in judgment rather than execution. The background post, by designer @ryolu_, adds that small teams with overlapping skills may outperform larger specialist teams coordinating handoffs.

Nov 22, 2025

Nov 22, 2025Sat

Nov 18, 2025

Nov 18, 2025Tue

Nov 17, 2025

Nov 17, 2025Mon
  1. Andrej KarpathyAI score60

    Karpathy argues verifiability predicts which tasks AI automates fastest

    AIKarpathy argues that verifiability, not specifiability, is the most predictive feature for AI automation, since verifiable tasks can be optimized directly or through reinforcement learning. He says a task is suited to this approach when the environment is resettable, efficient, and rewardable. This explains the jagged frontier of LLM progress, with verifiable domains like math and code advancing rapidly while creative and strategic tasks lag behind.

Nov 14, 2025

Nov 14, 2025Fri

Nov 13, 2025

Nov 13, 2025Thu
  1. Cognition Blog (Devin, Windsurf)AI score65

    Cognition's Devin review says it excels at scoped junior-level engineering work

    AICognition's 2025 performance review says Devin works best on clear, verifiable tasks such as migrations, vulnerability fixes, and unit tests. The company reports a 67% PR merge rate, up from 34% last year, and cites a bank that cut migration time per file from 30-40 hours to 3-4 hours. It also says Devin struggles with ambiguous requirements, mid-task scope changes, and soft-skill work that still needs human engineers.

    Why it matters: The report pairs concrete migration, vulnerability, and test-coverage figures with named weaknesses, letting engineering leaders judge where an agent fits in their own workflow.

Nov 5, 2025

Nov 5, 2025Wed
  1. Aman SangerAI score37

    Spending more compute at indexing time improves retrieval without extra inference cost

    AIAman Sanger of Cursor argues that heavy compute spent at indexing time can be reused to improve performance without raising inference-time compute, with embeddings as the simplest mechanism. Cursor's background post says semantic search improves its agent's accuracy across frontier models, especially in large codebases where grep alone falls short.

Oct 30, 2025

Oct 30, 2025Thu
  1. Chip HuyenAI score27

    Chip Huyen's AI product lessons: UX, data, and team structure matter most

    AIChip Huyen argues that many AI product failures stem from user experience, data quality, and organizational structure rather than the AI itself. She cites a chatbot whose traction improved after adding pre-populated questions and a voice option for users whose hands were busy, and a lead scoring model that was broken because marketing wasn't asking the right questions. She also notes that senior engineers gain the most from AI coding while resisting it more, and recommends building small tools for daily frustrations to solve the "idea crisis."

Oct 27, 2025

Oct 27, 2025Mon
  1. Lilian WengAI score44

    On-policy distillation uses a teacher model as dense process reward

    AILilian Weng says on-policy distillation lets a teacher model act as a process reward model, providing dense rewards during training. The approach also prevents the out-of-distribution shock that SFT-style training can cause during rollouts. Thinking Machines' related post reports it outperforms other approaches for math reasoning and an internal chat assistant at a fraction of the cost.

Oct 22, 2025

Oct 22, 2025Wed

Oct 14, 2025

Oct 14, 2025Tue

Jun 11, 2025

Jun 11, 2025Wed
  1. Cognition Blog (Devin, Windsurf)AI score62

    Cognition argues multi-agent architectures are fragile and proposes context-sharing principles

    AICognition argues that parallel multi-agent architectures are fragile because subagents act on conflicting, unshared assumptions. It proposes two principles for reliable agents: share context and full agent traces, and treat actions as carrying implicit decisions. The post recommends simpler single-threaded designs for most cases and notes that context compression and fine-tuned models can extend long-running tasks.

    Why it matters: The post explains concrete failure modes of parallel multi-agent setups and offers two context-sharing principles, useful for anyone designing long-running agent systems.

Sep 11, 2024

Sep 11, 2024Wed
  1. Cognition Blog (Devin, Windsurf)AI score60

    Cognition tests OpenAI o1 models in Devin's coding agent benchmark

    AICognition tested OpenAI's o1-mini and o1-preview in a simplified Devin-Base agent, comparing them with GPT-4o on its internal cognition-golden benchmark. The chart reports Devin-Base scores of 25.9% with GPT-4o, 34.6% with o1-mini, and 51.8% with o1-preview, versus 74.2% for the production Devin. The post also describes the benchmark's realistic environments, simulated users, and agent-based evaluation.

    Why it matters: The post explains how Cognition evaluates coding agents with autonomous, environment-based tests, which shows how base-model swaps are measured in practice.